Search Results for: upnp+/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/OCF-UPnP-Certification-Testing-and-Licensing-Agreement.pdf
UPnP Certification Guidlines – Rob Ranck
UPnP Certification Test Tool – Jon Wheeler
Basic Device V1.0
The Basic Device V 1.0 Standardized DCP is unique in that it does not define any services. However it is a very important DCP nonetheless and this brief note is intended to provide a potential implementer with some context and guidance on how to use the Basic Device V 1.0 Standardized DCP appropriately.
A Basic Device is one that follows all of the rules prescribed by the UPnP Device Architecture for discovery and description. Using the UPnP V 1.0 DCP Framework, a control point can discover a Basic Device, read it’s device description document and thereby obtain information about the device, such as device vendor, device name, a URL for further information, configuration or control, etc. As with any UPnP compliant device, the amount of information in the device description is completely up to the implementer.
Since the Basic Device does not include any services, Basic Devices are not, by themselves, eligible to get the UPnP logo. However, the UPnP Certification Test Tool is capable of testing Basic Devices. Also, if other UPnP Standardized Device types are embedded within a Basis Device (for example, a MediaServer or MediaRenderer), then those Standardized Device types are eligible to carry the UPnP logo.
The Basic Device represents a low cost of entry into the networked world. Basic Devices can be discovered and displayed as members of the UPnP device ecosystem. Programmatic interaction with Basic Devices by a control point will be limited, but manual interaction with a Basic Device can be done using any web browser. The Basic Device represents a very attractive way to get devices on the network, and a way for such devices to be discovered and controlled. As new scenarios, usage models and DCPs are created over time, what starts out as a Basic Device today can evolve into a device that fully participates in automated, coordinated control and web services based on the UPnP DCP framework.
Please consider the Basic Device V 1.0 Standardized DCP as an invitation to entering the networked world, and then grow along with the UPnP Forum into the digital home.
The following files contain the standardized device description for the Basic Device. This standard passed the 45-day UPnP Forum member review and was approved by the Steering Committee on December 11, 2002.
Necessary IP Declarations – UDA 1.0
Necessary IP Declarations – UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 20 July 2006
Capitalized terms are defined in the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement.
Pursuant to the requirements of section 3.8(a) and 3.8(f) of the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement, the following Members have made the indicated declarations related to Necessary IP that is not the Member’s Member Input that is incorporated in the above named Approved DCP Framework and their willingness to license such Necessary IP.
By providing this information, the UPnP Forum makes no representation regarding the accuracy or validity of this information nor its relevance to the UPnP Forum, DCPs, Proposed or Approved DCP Frameworks, test configuration files, Reference Implementations, Reference Implementation test logs, or to UPnP Compliant Devices. Consistent with Section 3.6(a)(D) of the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement, no Member, including Steering Committee representatives and working committee chairs, has undertaken on behalf of the UPnP Forum or its Members, any patent search with respect to the Proposed or Approved DCP Frameworks, Proposed DCPs, Standardized DCPs, Reference Implementations and associated test configuration files.
Members that now discover they have or acquire Necessary IP that is included in this Approved DCP Framework have a disclosure obligation under Section 3.8(f) and must submit its Declaration through the forms linked below.
UPnP Patent Disclosure Guidelines
Questions or concerns regarding the disclosure processes and guidelines may be referred to the Legal Inquiry Taskforce using this online form.
Declarations
Member: Hewlett Packard
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 20 July 2006
Signatory Name: Shivaun Albright
Title: Distinguished Technologist
Address 1: 8000 Foothills Blvd
Address 2:
City: Roseville
State: CA
Country: USA
Postal Code: 95747
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 12/4/2006 8:39:58 PM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Member: Intel Corporation
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 20 July 2006
Signatory Name: Scott Lofgren
Title: Program Manager
Address 1: 1900 Prairie City Road
Address 2:
City: Folsom
State: California
Country: U.S.A.
Postal Code: 95630
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 8/23/2007 2:54:08 PM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Member: Samsung Electronics
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 20 July 2006
Signatory Name: Alan Messer
Title: Senior Director
Address 1: 75 W. Plumeria Dr.
Address 2:
City: San Jose
State: CA
Country: USA
Postal Code: 95134
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 5/1/2008 3:24:26 PM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Contributors
The UPnP Forum in no way guarantees the accuracy or completeness of this contributor list and in no way implies any rights for or support from those members listed. Members contributing to this DCP Framework, but not included in the list below should notify the Forum Administrator.
Allegro Software Development Corporation
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation
Motorola
Nokia Corporation
Philips Electronics
Pioneer
Sony Corporation
Necessary IP Declarations – UDA 1.0
Necessary IP Declarations – UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 24 April 2008
Capitalized terms are defined in the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement.
Pursuant to the requirements of section 3.8(a) and 3.8(f) of the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement, the following Members have made the indicated declarations related to Necessary IP that is not the Member’s Member Input that is incorporated in the above named Approved DCP Framework and their willingness to license such Necessary IP.
By providing this information, the UPnP Forum makes no representation regarding the accuracy or validity of this information nor its relevance to the UPnP Forum, DCPs, Proposed or Approved DCP Frameworks, test configuration files, Reference Implementations, Reference Implementation test logs, or to UPnP Compliant Devices. Consistent with Section 3.6(a)(D) of the UPnP Forum Membership Agreement, no Member, including Steering Committee representatives and working committee chairs, has undertaken on behalf of the UPnP Forum or its Members, any patent search with respect to the Proposed or Approved DCP Frameworks, Proposed DCPs, Standardized DCPs, Reference Implementations and associated test configuration files.
Members that now discover they have or acquire Necessary IP that is included in this Approved DCP Framework have a disclosure obligation under Section 3.8(f) and must submit its Declaration through the forms linked below.
UPnP Patent Disclosure Guidelines
Questions or concerns regarding the disclosure processes and guidelines may be referred to the Legal Inquiry Taskforce using this online form.
Declarations
Member: Hewlett Packard
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 24 April 2008
Signatory Name: Shivaun Albright
Title: Distinguished Technologist
Address 1: 8000 Foothills Blvd
Address 2:
City: Roseville
State: CA
Country: USA
Postal Code: 95747
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 6/27/2008 2:15:59 PM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Member: Intel Corporation
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 24 April 2008
Signatory Name: Scott Lofgren
Title: Program Manager
Address 1: 1900 Prairie City Road
Address 2:
City: Folsom
State: California
Country: USA
Postal Code: 95630
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 6/2/2008 10:21:50 AM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Member: Samsung Electronics
Proposed DCP or DCP Framework: UDA 1.0 Revision Dated 24 April 2008
Signatory Name: Alan Messer
Title: Director
Address 1: 75 W. Plumeria Dr.
Address 2:
City: San Jose
State: CA
Country: USA
Postal Code: 95032
Email: [email protected]
Date and Time stamp: 6/27/2008 5:43:15 PM
Patent License Option: (ii) RAND terms and conditions
Contributors
The UPnP Forum in no way guarantees the accuracy or completeness of this contributor list and in no way implies any rights for or support from those members listed. Members contributing to this DCP Framework, but not included in the list below should notify the Forum Administrator.
Allegro Software Development Corporation
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Intel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation
Motorola
Nokia Corporation
Philips Electronics
Pioneer
Sony Corporation